Some other projects this week have made me arrive a little late to the party celebrating minimalism, taking off in last week's New York Times, then spilling over into Steve Smith’s blog and on Kyle Gann’s (and no doubt elsewhere). While I agree with some of the comments noting the narrow range of choices, frankly, some of those choices would have been mine as well. Just this week I lent a copy of Riley’s In C (the sunshine-filled Bang on a Can recording) to some friends, one of whom recalled hearing the composer in it years ago.
But Mary Jane Leach’s comment about Bruckner resonated the most with me. I have often thought that some listeners who hate the composer might try to recast him as one of minimalism’s forerunners. (Listen to the repeated horn calls in the Fourth Symphony, or consider the three-note motif that is the tiny building block of the Eighth.)
I would also include someone like Scelsi in these discussions, even if not all of his work really fits, even if he is in general rather uncategorizeable. But his Quattro pezzi su una nota sola (Four Pieces on a Single Note) would probably qualify.
My CD list would definitely include another Bang on a Can recording, with Andriessen’s Hout, Hoketus and Workers Union, all of which are not “the most minimal of the minimal,” but employ acute restrictions on timbre or rhythm for their impact. And my favorite Steve Reich recording includees some of his earliest work: Piano Phase, Clapping Music, It’s Gonna Rain and Come Out.
[Photo: Untitled (1959) by Agnes Martin, at Dia:Beacon, via ArtCritical.com]